Author
Mike Saks
Judith Allsop

Pub Date: 04/2007
Pages: 432

Click here for more information.
Mike Saks and Judith Allsop
Chapter 20 - Comparative Health Research
Viola Burau
 
 
Contributor biography
Viola Burau is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Aarhus, Denmark. Her research interests lie in comparative health policy, professions in the welfare state, the policies and politics of care and methods of cross-country comparison. She has published on governing care occupations, approaches to cross-country comparison and the politics and policies of health care. She has written two books: Comparative Health Policy (with R. H. Blank, Palgrave, 2nd edition forthcoming) and Governing Home Care (with H. Theobald and R. H Blank, Edward Elgar, forthcoming). She currently co-ordinates an international research project on the new governance of medical performance.
 
Chapter overview
The chapter shows how the cross-country, comparative perspective has become increasingly significant in understanding contemporary issues in health. It addresses issues of research design and strategy.
 
Chapter links
Chapter 16 - Mixed Methods and Multidisciplinary Research in Health Care
Chapter 18 - Researching the Health of Ethnic Minority Groups
 
Suggested Online Readings
Nathanson, C.A. (2005) ‘Collective Actors and Corporate Targets in Tobacco Control: A Cross-National Comparison’, Health Education and Behavior, 32 (3): 337-54.
Cross-national comparative analysis of tobacco control strategies can alert health advocates about how opportunities for public health action; the types of action possible and probabilities for success are shaped by political systems and cultures. This article is based on case studies of tobacco control in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France. Two questions are addressed: (a) To whom were the dangers of smoking attributed? (b) What was the role of collective action in combating the problems? Activists in Canada, Britain, and France took action earlier than in the United States to target the tobacco industry and the state. In the U.S. locally-based advocacy has tended to focus on the dangers of passive smoking. The paper concludes that US-style advocacy has played a major role in the decline in smoking.
 
Scott, P.A., Välimäki, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., Dassen, T., Gasull. M., Lemonidou, C., Arndt, M., Schopp, A., Suhonen, R. and Kaljonen, A. (2003) ‘Perceptions of Autonomy in the Care of Elderly People in Five European Countries’, Nursing Ethics, 10 (1): 28-38.
This article presents findings from a five country study of care for elderly people. The focus is on the perceptions of elderly patients and nurses on patients’ autonomy in nursing practice. Autonomy is defined as having two components: information received/given as a prerequisite, and decision making as the action. The results indicated differences between staff and patient perceptions of patient autonomy for both components in all five countries in which this survey was conducted.
 
Szarflarski, M. and Cubbins, L.A. (2004) ‘Self-Reported Health in Poland and the United States: A Comparative Analysis of Demographic, Family and Socioeconomic Influences’, Health, 8 (1): 5-31.
This study compares the social determinants of individual health between the United States, a capitalist society, and Poland, a ‘post-communist’ society. The effects of demographic factors, family characteristics and socioeconomic status on self-reported health are assessed using data from the 1994 American and Polish General Social Surveys. The results show lower self-reported health and a more rapid decline in health for people over 60 in Poland than in the United States. In Poland, women report worse health than do men while the opposite is found for the United States. The relationships between education, income and health were stronger in the United States than in Poland.
 
Further Reading
Blank, R. H. and Burau, V. (2004) Comparative Health Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

This introductory comparative text analyzes key issues in health policy from a research viewpoint and assesses how far policy problems and responses in different countries have common or diverse origins.

 
Burau, V. and Blank, R. H. (2006) ‘Comparing Health Policy: An Assessment of Typologies of Health Systems’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8(1): 63-76.
This recent article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to understanding the country-specific contexts of health, health care and health policies.
 
Mabbett, D. and Bolderson, H. (1999) ‘Theories and Methods in Comparative Social Policy’, in Clasen, J. (ed.) Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell.
This paper discusses different approaches to comparative international research and the implications of the comparative approach for the research process.