Author
Mike Saks
Judith Allsop

Pub Date: 04/2007
Pages: 432

Click here for more information.
Mike Saks and Judith Allsop
Chapter 10 - Quantitative Survey Methods in Health Research
Michael Calnan
 
 
Contributor biography
Michael Calnan is Professor of Medical Sociology in the Medical Research Council HSRC in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of Bristol, UK.
 
Chapter overview
This chapter defines and explains what quantitative survey methodology is. It describes the techniques and resources required for carrying out a survey; and discussing the role of theory in this context. The process of translating concepts into indicators and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of different survey techniques is outlined. Finally data analysis and presentation is discussed.
 
Chapter links
Chapter 9 - Health Research Sampling Methods
Chapter 11 - Statistical Methods for Health Data Analysis
 
Suggested Online Readings
Addington-Hall, J.M. and Karlsen, S. (2005) ‘A National Survey of Health Professionals and Volunteers Working in Voluntary Hospice Services in the UK: Attitudes to Current Issues Affecting Hospices and Palliative Care’, Palliative Medicine, 19 (1): 40-48.
This paper reports results from a national survey in 1999 of voluntary hospice services in the UK. It focuses on volunteer and staff views of the purposes of hospice care, and summarises current debates within palliative care. Twenty-five hospice services, stratified by region, services provided (inpatient care, day care and/or home care) and number of beds were randomly sampled from amongst 175 voluntary hospices in the UK. Nineteen participated. Seventy percent of a random sample of professional and voluntary staff within these hospices returned a postal questionnaire.
 
Tingle, A. and Hickey, G. (2000) ‘What is 'Direct Patient Care'? Developing Questions for a Questionnaire Survey’, Journal of Research in Nursing, 5 (1): 38-43.
Nurses' perceptions of, and involvement in, care-giving have been explored as part of a longitudinal, questionnaire survey investigating the careers of nurse diplomates. This paper outlines the problems which arose in defining 'care' for use in questionnaires, and explains how the concept of 'care' was operationalised using previous literature and work with a pilot cohort. It argues that developing a common understanding of 'care' will enable comparisons to be made across studies that are exploring the concept.
 
White, R., Walker, P., Roberts, S., Kalisky, S. and White, P. (2006) ‘Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ): Testing what we Teach Patients about COPD’, Chronic Respiratory Disease, 3(3): 123-31.
This paper discusses the use of a multiple-choice questionnaire (BCKQ) to test the impact of education for patients with COPD. Patients were split into two groups – those receiving education and those not receiving education. The questionnaire tested knowledge of 13 topics, using five statements for which there was a right or wrong answer. For the group not receiving education, there was good test-retest reliability. For the patients who attended an education programme, there was a significant improvement in results. The questionnaire was assessed for validity and consistency. The paper argues that the questionnaire enables the effectiveness of education to be assessed and will be of value in developing and comparing different educational interventions.
 
Further Reading
Bryman, A. (2004) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
This book provides useful complementary reading to this chapter, especially in part two.
 
De Vaus, D. (2002) Surveys in Social Research. 5th edition. London: Routledge.
This text covers all the main issues discussed in this chapter in more detail – and is strongly recommended.
 
Fowler, F. (2001) Survey Research Methods. London: Sage
This again is a good supplementary text, setting survey methods within a general context of other research methods.